New OSHA Clarifications Impact The Masonry Industry

Words: Jeff Buczkiewicz

OSHA has had numerous recent rulings and interpretations that have been good for our industry.  Just yesterday, they announced further clarification on a COVID interpretation that was released earlier this year.  In the earlier interpretation, they stated that if you wrote down temperatures of employees while screening for the day that you needed to keep them for 30 years. In addition, they also stated that any screening paperwork asking about COVID symptoms would also need to be kept for 30 years.  The MCAA, through our coalition (Construction Industry Safety Coalition), asked for OSHA to reconsider and to further clarify their ruling (click here to read the letter). 

 

As a result of the request, OSHA further clarified that unless the temperatures or work was being done by a physician, nurse, or other healthcare personnel, that the records did not need to kept for 30 years.  This was a nice win for the CISC on the interpretation.  We were arguing against the need to comply with the Access to Employees Exposure and Medical Records Standard that they cited as the reason for the original interpretation. 

 

In a separate issue, the MCAA filed again with members of the CISC as an interested party (Amicus Brief) to a court case brought by the AFL CIO to force OSHA to draft an ETS (an emergency standard for dealing with COVID 19) to deal with the impact of COVID on employees.  The CISC argued that there was enough guidance and industry cooperation on directives from CDC, and OSHA that a rule was not needed.  The courts agreed with OSHA and the CISC and rejected the request from the AFL CIO.  The AFL CIO has filed for a rehearing on the ETS. We will see were this ends up over the next few weeks. 

 

In yet another issue, this one related to Beryllium and the rule that included construction into a beryllium rule, the MCAA and some CISC partners had sued OSHA over the process and lack there of process for the inclusion of construction in the beryllium rule.  We have been working to settle the case, and movement has been made to help settle the case.  We are still early in the process on settlement, but things are looking positive at the time.  Look for further details on this as they develop. 

How One Masonry Contractor Conquered Time Card Fraud with CrewTracks
July 2025

In the world of masonry, precision and efficiency are essential. But what happens when the very foundation of your operational data—time tracking—is riddled with inaccuracies and even fraud? This was the challenge facing a mid-sized commercial masonry fir

Built to Entertain: A Mason’s Role in Crafting Custom Home Bars
July 2025

Summer is here, and backyard gatherings are officially back on the calendar. It’s the time when homeowners want to bring entertaining experiences to the home with dedicated spaces that are both custom and high-end

Work Zone Safety and Emergency Preparedness in the Masonry Industry
July 2025

Masonry professionals work in complex and fast-paced environments that demand precision, strength, and coordination. Whether on residential builds or large commercial projects, masons encounter a unique combination of physical hazards that require a consi

Bonding with Masonry 2025 Q2
July 2025

This issue’s questions come from an Architect and an Engineer. What questions do you have? Send them to info@masonrymagazine.com, attention Technical Talk. Q. An Architect asks about anchoring coping stones on a cavity wall with brick veneer and CMU backu